| You are here: | |
| Newspaper Articles |
|
|
|
Stanford's
Homegrown Opposition Leader of anti-growth alliance has The Farm in his blood San Francisco Chronicle February 9, 2001 This Precious Plot |
||||
|
A Lesson For Stanford
From Dispute STANFORD development
plan is approved Stanford expansion
wins county approvalNew
Housing, Foothills Protection in Plan
Development debate Stanford Faces
Growth Restrictions STANFORD: Hills
are still in question Old map showed development plans Simitian: Stanford
knew Supe says he pitched his plan for the foothills over a month ago Stanford University
is confusing the ivory tower with the Great Wall of China EDITORIAL - 'Judge'
Simitian issues a decision STANFORD:
Simitian wants 1,000 acres in foothills protected EDITORIAL
– Stanford plans face final county vote STANFORD:
City aims for permanent open space Supervisor's proposal
for Stanford EDITORIAL: Stanford's
proposed land swap is a creative idea for JCC site But in exchange the
university wants its general use permit approved; county should ensure
that good planning principles are followed Editorial: Promises
come too close to manipulation Rally protests
Dish closing Students march, sign petition against rules restricting Dish
access Editorial: Dish
modifications unpleasant and unjustified LAND USE: Stanford
protests building linkage University reacts to county staff recommendations Neighbors critique
Stanford's land plan Our Town: Stanford's
new era Election focus:
land use Supervisors: Kniss, Sandoval split hairs over Stanford University
stances STANFORD: County
calls for foothills protection Planning staff recommends 25-year growth
boundary Planners aim to
save foothills Making Way for
the New An in-depth look at Stanford’s 10-year development plan Palo Alto scrutinizes
Stanford development plan Stanford, green
group bicker over 154 acres Teach-in: let the
Farm stay that way STANFORD: Critics
of university's plans are not 'bashers' They support 'putting Stanford
back on track' STANFORD: Stanford's
plans are criticized Golfers, environmentalists note development impacts
Editorial: Tough
home stretch ahead for Stanford Carnegie proposal
is criticized Palo Alto, Menlo Park suggest alternative sites EIR: Stanford plan
has big impacts Not all impacts will be mitigated Stanford Development
Plan Assailed 54,000 cars use
El Camino each day, other streets studied Stanford's plans
may clutter open space, increase traffic Editorial: Stanford
vs. hikers What are university's motives? Its plan for the Dish is vague
Salamanders could
affect building plans University is creating new foothills habitat for
shy amphibian Editorial: Cracking
down at the Dish Our Town: About
those hills Campus rally addresses
concerns over the STANFORD: Stanford
plan is in county's hands Campus development plan gets final public airing
before July STANFORD: Open
space district wants foothills protections Group opposes development west
of Junipero Serra Boulevard STANFORD: County
wants open space restrictions Planning staff alternative would offer greater
protection EDITORIAL Editorial: Stanford
plan ready for careful study Land use plan divides
community STANFORD: Palo
Alto asks for campus growth limit City also wants open space protection,
middle school site City wants 25-year
open space committment from Stanford Housing, open space
debated Stanford polls
residents about growth plans Simitian presses
Stanford for details County Pans Stanford's
Draft Growth Plan EDITORIAL “Trust
us,” Stanford says Development plan ignores |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
| Last Modified: | ||||